Five workflow automations delivered for Chimpy
Five completed workflows for Chimpy: Slack recaps, message digests, invoice filing, dictation cleanup and a Friday summary. Time savings remain estimates.
Five workflow automations delivered for Chimpy: a Wispr Flow recap to Slack, a twice-daily digest of Slack and email, invoice PDFs filed to Drive, dictation cleanup, and a Friday summary of the week and open items. The project was completed and received a 5.0/5 Upwork review in September 2026. The original estimate of roughly 5 to 6 hours a week covers only the first four workflows. The arithmetic is below; measured savings are not available yet.
Who Chimpy is, and what they asked for
Chimpy calls itself Europe's largest powerbank rental service. Zürich, since 2013, reusable solar-charged powerbanks rented and returned through retail. Their own page says they've made more than 10 million rentals. Inside, the team runs on Google Workspace for meetings, mail and files, Slack for talk, and Wispr Flow for dictation. Ordinary tools. The gaps are between them.
A team lead there originally sent me a brief with four items. The Friday Weekly Summary became the fifth delivered workflow. I'm quoting the parts that matter, in their words, because a brief this clear makes the work easier to scope.
On meeting recaps:
"Once that recap is ready, I can post it to Slack, either a specific channel (e.g. 'marketing') or a 1:1 DM with a specific person, in one or two clicks maximum."
On the daily noise:
"An automation that runs twice a day and compiles a digest of: Slack messages I received or was tagged in; work-related emails. LinkedIn is a nice-to-have. Flag if it's feasible given LinkedIn's API restrictions, but Slack and email are the priority and must work."
On invoices:
"Invoices arrive either by email or through various SaaS tools I use. I need these PDFs automatically detected and uploaded into a specific Google Drive folder, without me manually downloading or uploading anything."
On dictation:
"Right now I manually paste the transcript into Claude and ask it to rewrite it, then copy it out again. I want this collapsed into a single click."
Notice what's not in there. No AI strategy. No platform. Four leaks, each one a thing they do by hand today. That's the brief I'd want from you.
The build, in the order I'm doing it
Each one is a small workflow, scheduled or event-driven, that talks to Google Workspace and Slack through their official APIs, with a language model for the summarising and rewriting steps. I use Claude for those. The order below is mine, not the brief's. Each step builds a part the next one reuses.
1. Dictation cleanup, first
Smallest build, used most often. A hotkey takes the text you just dictated, sends it with a short style guide built from the client's own past messages, and returns the tightened version in a small review window. One more key pastes it. Wispr Flow already strips filler words and can rewrite selected text by voice. What the custom build adds is one house style, in one key, with a look before it goes.
It went first for two reasons. The client feels it on day one, twenty times a day. And building that style guide teaches me how they write, which the recap and the digest need too. What it can't do: know what you meant when the transcript heard Tuesday as Thursday. That's why the review window stays.
Full write-up: cleaning up Wispr Flow dictation with one key.
2. Meeting recap to Slack, second
Jari Brontesi, marketing manager at Chimpy, dictates the recap in Wispr Flow. The workflow transcribes it in the structure and tone he wants, then automatically pastes the result into his Slack account. The useful part is the whole handoff: spoken notes become a familiar, readable recap in the place his team already works. This is the current workflow; the earlier Google Meet and shortcut design has been replaced.
Full write-up: Wispr Flow recaps to Slack.
3. The twice-daily digest, third
A scheduled trigger fires at 09:00 and 14:00 in the client's time zone, not the server's. On a self-hosted n8n instance the default is New York unless you set it, and I've seen a digest land at three in the afternoon because nobody did. It pulls Slack DMs and mentions since the last run, then Gmail threads since the last run. Polling on a schedule, not push: Gmail's push route needs Pub/Sub and a watch renewed every seven days, and for a twice-a-day digest that's machinery for nothing. The model then writes one line per sender: who, what they want, what they're waiting on. Every line carries a permalink to the Slack thread or the Gmail thread, so you jump straight there. It's third because it's the biggest, and because the summaries need a few real weeks of tuning before they're trusted.
Full write-up: the twice-daily Slack and email digest.
4. Invoice PDFs to Drive, last
Watch the inbox for PDFs that look like invoices: a sender allowlist, subject words, the text inside the PDF. Add scheduled pulls from the SaaS tools that expose invoices. Rename to a convention, date, vendor, amount. Upload into one Drive folder through the parents field, and skip duplicates. It never pays anything and never deletes anything. It's last not because it's hard but because a mistake here costs most, and the allowlist is better built from a month of real invoices than from a guess.
Full write-up: saving invoice PDFs to Google Drive automatically.
Friday Weekly Summary
The fifth workflow brings the week together. Every Friday, it gathers Slack messages, email and meeting transcripts from the week. Claude summarizes what happened and what is still open, then sends the summary by Slack DM. The team lead decides what to prioritize and follow up. This weekly overview complements the twice-daily digest, which covers new messages since its last run.
No additional time-saving estimate is assigned to the weekly summary.
What I told them no to
Four things, and I'd rather say them here than in month two.
LinkedIn is out of the digest. The official API gives every developer only the open permissions: sign-in and posting. Nothing reads messages or the inbox. The other programmes need partner approval, and the compliance ones are closed to requests. Unofficial scrapers exist. They break the terms and get accounts restricted, so I don't build on them. Honest options: LinkedIn's own email notifications land in Gmail and the digest picks those up, or you open LinkedIn yourself at the same two times.
Some SaaS invoices stay manual. A tool that emails its invoice, or exposes it through an API, is in. A tool that only shows it behind a login is out. I won't automate a browser logging in as you to fetch a PDF. For those, the workflow leaves a monthly reminder with the list.
The dictation review step stays. One glance before paste. The model tightens language. It doesn't know what you meant, and a wrong name in a message to a customer is on you, not the tool.
The recap goes from Wispr Flow into Slack. It is transcribed in Jari’s preferred format and automatically pasted into his account. The digest is delivered to you, not to a channel. No automation replies to anyone, decides what's confidential, or pays an invoice.
What it should give back, estimated
These are worked examples for the original four workflows, not measurements. The Friday Weekly Summary is excluded from this estimate.
| Automation | Say | Back per week |
|---|---|---|
| Dictation cleanup | 20 messages a day, 45 seconds each of paste, wait, copy, paste | about 1.25 hours |
| Recap to Slack | 4 meetings a day, 3 minutes each of open, copy, find, paste, send | about 1 hour |
| Digest | 24 checks a day at 2 minutes, minus two 5-minute digest reads | just over 3 hours |
| Invoices | 40 a month, 3 minutes each to find, download, rename, upload | about half an hour |
| Total | roughly 5 to 6 hours, estimated |
The digest line is the one I trust least and want most. The minutes are the small part. Microsoft's 2025 Work Trend Index found people on Microsoft 365 interrupted every two minutes by a meeting, email or notification, with the average worker getting 117 emails a day. Gloria Mark at UC Irvine measured attention on a screen at about 47 seconds before a switch, and around 25 and a half minutes to get back to the interrupted task. Two reads a day instead of 24 checks is the point. The hours are the receipt.
After 30 days in use I'll measure it, and the measured number replaces this table. It gets published even if it's smaller.
This was a fixed-price build. Ongoing maintenance is scoped separately. How I scope builds like this is on the implementation page.
Why a plumber is building this for a powerbank company
Because the job is the same. On the tools, a leak is water going where it shouldn't, and you find it by tracing where it went, not by guessing. Here, a week is going where it shouldn't, into open, copy, find, paste, send, twenty times a day, and you find it the same way. I started with plumbers, HVAC and electricians because I know their vans. But the leak looks identical in a marketing team in Zürich, and I build for any service business that has one. What changes is the vocabulary. What doesn't is the diagnosis before the tool.
Do this this week
Four things, none of which involve buying anything.
- Count the copy-paste. For five days, keep a tally of every time you move text or a file between two tools by hand. Meetings to Slack, a check of the inbox, an invoice to a folder, a dictation into a rewriter. Multiply by a rough minutes-each. That's your version of the table above.
- Write the brief in four items. Plain words, one thing per item, like the quotes above. "I do X by hand, I want it to be one click." If you can't write it in a sentence, it isn't ready to automate.
- Check what you already pay for. Google Meet writes the notes. Slack's Workflow Builder runs scheduled and link-started workflows on paid plans. Wispr Flow has a rewrite command of its own. If a tool you already have covers the item, use it and cross it off.
- Build the smallest one first. The one used twenty times a day, not the one that sounds biggest. How I'd pick is in the four automations a small team should build first.
If you'd like a second pair of eyes on your four, book a growth call. It's thirty minutes and free, and I'll tell you if the answer is a setting you already have.
Questions people ask
Who is Chimpy?
Europe's largest powerbank rental service, based in Zürich and founded in 2013. Their about page reports more than 10 million rentals with reusable, solar-charged powerbanks, rented and returned through retail. The team I'm working with runs on Google Workspace, Slack and Wispr Flow.
Can a workflow automation read my LinkedIn inbox?
Not through the official API. LinkedIn's open permissions cover sign-in and posting only. Reading messages sits behind partner programmes that are approval-only or closed. Unofficial scrapers break the terms of use and get accounts restricted, so I don't build on them. Use LinkedIn's email notifications, which land in Gmail, or check LinkedIn yourself at set times.
How much time do these automations save?
Estimated, not measured: roughly 5 to 6 hours a week for one person across the original four workflows, excluding the Friday Weekly Summary, built from the brief's own assumptions (say 4 meetings a day, 20 dictated messages a day, 40 invoices a month, and a check of Slack and email every 20 minutes). The measured figure after 30 days in use replaces the estimate, and it gets published even if it's smaller.
Will the automations post to Slack or reply to people without me?
The formatted recap is automatically pasted into Jari’s Slack account. The digest is delivered to you, not to a channel. Nothing replies to anyone, nothing decides what's confidential, and the invoice workflow never pays or deletes anything. The dictation cleanup shows you the result before you paste it.
What does a build like this cost?
It's a fixed-price build plus a monthly retainer to run and maintain it. The price depends on the scope, which is written down before anything is built, and I'd rather cross an item off than automate something a tool you already pay for covers. Book a growth call and I'll tell you which of your four items are worth it.
Sources
- 1.Chimpy: About us · Europe's largest powerbank rental service; since 2013; more than 10 million rentals with reusable, solar-charged powerbanks
- 2.LinkedIn: Getting access to LinkedIn APIs · Open permissions are profile, email and w_member_social only; nothing reads the inbox; compliance access is closed
- 3.Microsoft Work Trend Index 2025: Breaking down the infinite workday · Interrupted every 2 minutes by a meeting, email or notification; average worker receives 117 emails a day
- 4.University of California: Can't pay attention? You're not alone (Gloria Mark) · Screen attention averages 47 seconds; about 25 and a half minutes to return to an interrupted task
- 5.Slack API: chat.postMessage · Posts to a channel ID or opens a DM by user ID; needs chat:write
- 6.Google Meet Help: Take notes for me · Notes doc generated shortly after the meeting ends, saved in the organiser's Drive; needs an eligible Workspace edition or AI plan
- 7.Gmail API: Push notifications · Runs through Cloud Pub/Sub; watch must be renewed at least every 7 days
- 8.Google Drive API: Create and populate folders · Files land in a folder via the parents field; one parent only
- 9.n8n docs: Schedule Trigger · Cron-style schedules; default timezone on self-hosted instances is America/New_York unless set
- 10.Slack Help: Guide to Workflow Builder · Scheduled, link-started and webhook-started workflows; paid plans

Written by Ivar André Knutsen
I build and run AI systems, internal tools and workflow automation. You work directly with me from the first conversation through implementation and support. About Ivar
Want this looked at in your business?
We look at where you want the business to go, what is slowing you down and where AI could make a useful difference. You get a clear recommendation: a tool to try, a focused automation, a broader system or a closer look at the process. Any build is scoped and quoted before work starts. Free, no obligation.
Single automations are quoted on the call: a setup fee plus a monthly retainer to run them. Full systems start at $4,500, fixed scope, fixed price.
Book a free 30-minute call